My humble opinion simply stated, published in the Rhino Times last week:
In the haste to marginalize a minority group of human beings and increase big government interference in our personal lives, NC legislators wrote Amendment One using “vague and untested language” that will create a legal and social quagmire if it passes. Thousands of unmarried adults, children, and teens are likely to lose:
· health insurance
· statutory protections against domestic violence
· consideration of “children’s best interests” in custody cases
· family privileges in medical crises
· health insurance
· statutory protections against domestic violence
· consideration of “children’s best interests” in custody cases
· family privileges in medical crises
Many NC couples are not married for personal, financial, or legal reasons. By making their relationships legally invalid and unrecognizable, Amendment One would create enormous problems for them, our social systems, and family courts. Millions of taxpayer dollars would be paid to attorneys instead of improving our state’s infrastructure, education system, job outlook, etc.
Please research the facts about Amendment One, and join leaders from every political persuasion in voting against it.
*************************************************
Idaho does appear to have had negative consequences from their marriage amendment. One source I read said that state employees did lose partner health benefits. And here is proof that attorneys have had to debate, answer questions, etc., all at the expense of Idaho taxpayers: http://thecritui.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Brandt3.pdf This source also notes some of the consequences experienced in Michigan.
I stand by my statements. I like Marriage, but Amendment One is bad for NC.
No comments:
Post a Comment